If you, as a director/shareholder of a limited company, live in a residential property owned by your company, there are significant tax consequences for both you personally and for the company.
Although you can live in it, it’s not tax-efficient, and there are complex tax implications. HMRC treats this as a Benefit in Kind (BIK) to the director.
For the Director (You, Individually):
Benefit in Kind (BIK): HMRC considers your use of the property as a “benefit”, and you’ll be taxed on it as if it’s part of your salary.
The value of this benefit is based on:
- The annual value of the property (commonly market rent), or
- A specific HMRC calculation for “living accommodation”.
This BIK is added to your income and taxed via PAYE or self-assessment.
For the Company, the company pays Class 1A National Insurance Contributions (NICs) on the BIK at 13.8%, it cannot claim mortgage interest or property running costs as a business expense unless rent is charged at market rate and it must complete P11D forms and report to HMRC.
EXAMPLE SCENARIO
- Property Value: £400,000 , Market Rent: £24,000/year (£2,000/month), Director Lives in Property Rent-Free, Company Owns Property
HMRC calculates BIK for living accommodation like this:
If the property costs more than £75,000, BIK = Annual Value (e.g. market rent) + Additional Charge (based on cost of property)
1. Annual Value (Market Rent) = £24,000
2. Additional Charge (only if property > £75,000):
- Formula: (Cost – £75,000) × Official Interest Rate
- Assume cost = £400,000
- Excess over £75,000 = £325,000
- Official interest rate (2025/26 assumed) = 2.25% (subject to change annually)
- Additional charge = £325,000 × 2.25% = £7,312.50
Total benefit in kind = £24,000 + £7,312.50 = £31,312.50
Tax payable by director assuming you’re a higher-rate taxpayer (40% bracket) would be BIK tax of £31,312.50 × 40% = £12,525/year, if you are a basic rate taxpayer, its £6,262.50/year
The company would pay BIK tax 13.8% × £31,312.50 = £4,322.13/year
Company also cannot deduct BIK-related property costs and this would need to be reported on a P11D for you
Pros and Cons of Director Living in Company-Owned Property
ADVANTAGES
| Advantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Asset Protection | Property is under company, not personal name |
| Capital Preservation | Can use company funds instead of post-tax personal funds |
| Possible use of company’s surplus cash | Rather than extracting cash (and paying income tax) to buy personally |
DISADVANTAGES
| Disadvantage | Explanation |
|---|---|
| BIK Taxation | Director pays tax as if it’s additional income |
| Company Pays NICs | 13.8% Class 1A NIC on the BIK value |
| No Mortgage Interest Relief | Interest isn’t deductible unless let commercially |
| No CGT Allowance on Sale | On eventual sale, company pays corporation tax on gain, then you pay dividend tax to extract funds |
| No Private Residence Relief | Unlike owning personally, no PRR available for CGT if sold with gain |
| Complex admin | Requires P11D filing, payroll entries, company accounting for benefit and NICs |
ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS
Option A: Charge Market Rent, You (director) pay £2,000/month to the company, no BIK arises as you’re not receiving a benefit, the company then pays corporation tax on the rental profit, thus avoiding personal BIK tax — but pay from post-tax income.
Option B: Buy personally instead, using salary/dividends to buy it, therefore can claim Private Residence Relief on CGT, avoiding BIK, NICs, and admin complications, but you’ll pay income/dividend tax to extract funds from the company to fund the purchase.
If you would like any further help please get in touch
This information is correct as of 31.10.25

Dipak is a qualified chartered accountant who founded DD Chartered Accountant in 2012. Having trained as an auditor, later moving to Ernst & Young, he realised that his true professional passion lay in working directly with people in small and medium-sized businesses, helping them reach their true potential.
